California Medical Malpractice Attorney
En EspaƱol
California Medical Malpractice Lawyer About Us Case Results Client Testimonials News Articles Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Tell Us About Your Case:
Visit our video center
Information Center
Anesthesia
Bilirubin
Birth Injury
Brachial Plexus Injury
Brain Cooling
Brain Injuries
Cancer Misdiagnosis
Cerebral Palsy
Dental Malpractice
Developmental Delay
Doctor/Hospital Malpractice
ER Malpractice
Gestational Diabetes
Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Kaiser Malpractice
Kernicterus
Medical Misdiagnosis
Medical Negligence
Medication Error
Meningitis
Mental Retardation
Microcephaly
Nursing Home Negligence
Nursing Malpractice
Paralysis
Pitocin
Plastic Surgery
Post Term Pregnancy
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Premature Delivery
Regional Center
Statute of Limitations
Surgical Error
Traumatic Brain Injuries
Wrongful Death
Medical Malpractice Blog
Learn more about your case from our informative blog

 Doe v. Roe Medical Center

Dr. Fagel achieved a settlement of $3.65 million on behalf of a 3-year-old child who suffers from cerebral palsy and requires g-tube feeding as a result of negligent care administered by hospital midwives.

The Plantiff, age 24, developed gestational diabetes during her pregnancy and was administered insulin for control. The plaintiff was admitted to the Medical Center after the child was due and was given Pitocin. The midwives determined there was an arrest of dialation due to inadequate forces or labor. Pitocin was turned off twice due to decelerations of the heart rate. Shortly after an amnioinfusion, the fetal heart rate dropped without recovery at which point the plaintiff was transferred to an operating room and a c-section was performed.  The child was immediately diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

The defendants alleged that all care was conducted within the standard of care. According to the defendants, there was no indication for early delivery before the bradycardia, which was not a predictable occurrence.

Dr. Fagel was able to refute the various claims made by the defendants and demonstrated that the midwives were negligent for failing to diagnose an arrest and fetal intolerance of labor. This reading required the OB to deliver the baby via c-section before bradycardia.