
Hare v. Anonymous Physician/Hospital
Dr. Fagel achieved a settlement of $4,200,000 on the behalf
of a child who now suffers spastic diplegic cerebral palsy after hospital staff
failed to treat a placental abruption in a timely fashion. The mother was
admitted to the defendant hospital for induction of labor four days prior to
her expected delivery date. The labor progressed slowly on Pitocin without any
complications until the fetal monitored showed a sharp drop in heart rate at
1:42 a.m. Nurses began arriving to the room three minutes later and performed a
variety of actions to treat the problem, including stopping the Pitocin,
increasing IV fluids and shifting the mother’s position. Despite their
attempts, the fetal monitor continued to show a severe persistent bradycardia
(low heart rate). At 1:57 a.m., the charged nurse asked another nurse to call
the OB, who was at home, and inform him that he needed to come to the hospital
to deliver the patient. However, the nurse never told the OB about the severity
of the situation or even mentioned the need for an emergency Cesarean section.
The OB arrived at the hospital 20 minutes after he was called, and the minor
plaintiff was delivered at 2:22 a.m. with dangerously low Apgar scores. The OB
also noted a 75 percent placental abruption and delivery and had to perform an
emergency hysterectomy because of continued bleeding from the uterus. The baby
was transferred to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit with a diagnosis of hypoxic
brain injuries and was later determined to have spastic diplegic cerebral
palsy.
The defense argued that the nurses called the OB as soon as required
by the standard of care and that the hospital was not negligent because
delivery of the infant was accomplished within five minutes of the OB’s
arrival. Furthermore, the defense claimed that the standard of care allowed the
OB to be at home on a low-risk patient, and because of the severity of the
placental abruption, an earlier delivery would not have led to a better
outcome. However, Dr. Fagel contended that unnecessary delays in the delivery
significantly contributed to the plaintiff’s injuries. For example, the nurses
should have called the OB as soon as the fetal monitor displayed the abrupt
heart rate deceleration. The nurse who called the OB at home was also negligent
for failing to mention that the situation was an emergency and required an
immediate C-section. All in all, because the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries
was an acute placental abruption, an earlier delivery clearly would have improved
the baby’s condition.