California Medical Malpractice Attorney
En Español
California Medical Malpractice Lawyer About Us Case Results Client Testimonials News Articles Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Tell Us About Your Case:
Visit our video center
Information Center
Anesthesia
Bilirubin
Birth Injury
Brachial Plexus Injury
Brain Cooling
Brain Injuries
Cancer Misdiagnosis
Cerebral Palsy
Dental Malpractice
Developmental Delay
Doctor/Hospital Malpractice
ER Malpractice
Gestational Diabetes
Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Kaiser Malpractice
Kernicterus
Medical Misdiagnosis
Medical Negligence
Medication Error
Meningitis
Mental Retardation
Microcephaly
Nursing Home Negligence
Nursing Malpractice
Paralysis
Pitocin
Plastic Surgery
Post Term Pregnancy
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Premature Delivery
Regional Center
Statute of Limitations
Surgical Error
Traumatic Brain Injuries
Wrongful Death
Medical Malpractice Blog
Learn more about your case from our informative blog

Young v. Anonymous Physician/Medical Center

Dr. Fagel obtained a settlement of $3,250,000 million on behalf of a child who now suffers from cerebral palsy and developmental delays after physicians failed to properly respond to complications in the labor and delivery process. Upon admission to the hospital, the defendant obstetrician diagnosed the plaintiff’s mother with pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH). Blood tests showed an elevation in liver enzymes and decreased platelets, which indicated a potentially severe form of PIH. The obstetrician decided to induce labor with Pitocin and placed the mother on an epidural without warning her of possible risks. The obstetrician then went home without ever discussing plans for fluid management with the defendant obstetrician. Over the next few hours, the mother’s platelet count continued to drop while her blood pressure continued to rise. At 4:25 a.m. her blood pressure began to drop and the fetal heart monitor displayed decelerations. 20 minutes later, the nurses called the anesthesiologist and the obstetrician, who was still at home. The obstetrician arrived at 5:05 a.m. and decided to proceed with vacuum delivery, rather than a Cesarean section. After repeatedly failing to deliver the baby by both vacuum and forceps, he finally decided to perform a C-section and delivered the baby at 6:24 a.m. The infant plaintiff was born with critically low vital signs and severe brain damage from oxygen deprivation.

The defendants argued that all care was within the proper standard of care and that there was no injury from the placement of the epidural. However, Dr. Fagel was able to show that the defendants were negligent and therefore responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries for a variety of reasons. First, the obstetrician was negligent for not managing the patient as a high risk delivery and performing a C-section prior to the onset of serious complications. He was additionally negligent for leaving the hospital without deciding who would manage the patient’s fluids, and was further negligent for not immediately proceeding to deliver the baby via C-section when he was called back to the hospital. Finally, the defendant anesthesiologist was negligent for failing to monitor the patient’s fluids and blood pressure during labor.