California Medical Malpractice Attorney
En Español
California Medical Malpractice Lawyer About Us Case Results Client Testimonials News Articles Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us
Name:
Email:
Phone:
Tell Us About Your Case:
Visit our video center
Information Center
Anesthesia
Bilirubin
Birth Injury
Brachial Plexus Injury
Brain Cooling
Brain Injuries
Cancer Misdiagnosis
Cerebral Palsy
Dental Malpractice
Developmental Delay
Doctor/Hospital Malpractice
ER Malpractice
Gestational Diabetes
Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Kaiser Malpractice
Kernicterus
Medical Misdiagnosis
Medical Negligence
Medication Error
Meningitis
Mental Retardation
Microcephaly
Nursing Home Negligence
Nursing Malpractice
Paralysis
Pitocin
Plastic Surgery
Post Term Pregnancy
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Premature Delivery
Regional Center
Statute of Limitations
Surgical Error
Traumatic Brain Injuries
Wrongful Death
Medical Malpractice Blog
Learn more about your case from our informative blog

Nanda v. Kaiser

Dr. Fagel obtained a settlement of $4.1 million on behalf of a child who now suffers severe cerebral palsy after doctors failed to recognize intra-uterine growth retardation and perform a timely delivery. Throughout the month prior to delivery, examinations confirmed that the mother’s fundal height was shorter than normal but no precautions were taken. When the mother was finally admitted to the labor and delivery unit, a fetal monitor showed an abnormal heart rate so a Cesarean section was ordered. One hour and ten minutes after being admitted to the L&D unit, the minor plaintiff was delivered via C-section with low vital signs. About two months later, the plaintiff was diagnosed with cerebral palsy due to lack of blood or oxygen to the brain during the delivery process.

Despite the defendants’ claims that all treatment was within the standard of care, Dr. Fagel and his associates proved that the plaintiff’s brain injuries could and should have been prevented. The defendant physicians failed to recognize and diagnose the intra-uterine growth retardation that was revealed by earlier tests, which requires earlier delivery for a more normal outcome. If the defendants had properly interpreted the fundal height measurements that were recorded throughout the month prior to delivery, proper action could have been taken and the plaintiff’s injuries would have been avoided.